COMPUTE! ISSUE 58 / MARCH 1985 / PAGE 10
Mystery Computers
I read your piece on the PCjr ["IBM's New & Improved PCjr,"
COMPUTE!, October 1984]. How dare you
say that there will soon be
computers with the processing power of the PC-XT for less than $500 and
not say what they are? I was trembling on the verge of putting
out $600
or $700 for an Atari 800XL system, and now I don't know what to do, and
won't until your article entitled "Some Machines For Less Than $500
Which Offer More Processing Power Than A $4,000 PC-XT" appears-probably
(as they say in the computer biz) sometime during the first quarter of
1985.
Norman Hartweg
Part of the answer to your question
can be found in the August 1984 issue of COMPUTE! within the article
entitled "Software Power! The Summer Consumer Electronics Show." That
CES report included four paragraphs on the new Sinclair QL (Quantum
Leap), which has been available in Britain for several months. Standard
features of the Sinclair QL include: 128K of RAM (expandable to 640K);
a Motorola 68008 microprocessor for the central processing unit; two
built-in microdrives for mass storage; a full-size, 65-key,
typewriter-style keyboard with special function keys; BASIC in ROM; an
operating system in ROM that supports windowing and multitasking;
built-in local area networking for up to 64 QLs; two RS-232 serial
ports; TV and RGB video outputs; high-resolution color graphics; text
modes up to 85 columns wide; joystick cursor control; and four bundled
business programs (word processor, spreadsheet, data base manager, and
graphics)-all in a three-pound package for a suggested retail price of
$499.
As you can see,
the Sinclair QL arguably has more processing power than an IBM PC-XT.
The PC-XT's CPU is the same chip found in the PC and PCjr: the Intel
8088, an 8/16-bit microprocessor. The Sinclair QL's 68008 is a
16/32-bit microprocessor, a version of the 68000 chip found in the
Apple Macintosh. (However, the 8088 in the PC-XT is assisted by an 8087
math chip, which evens things out a little.)
Does this mean
that the Sinclair QL is a more powerful computer overall than a PC-XT?
Although it has a faster processor and can be expanded to the same
amount of memory, probably not. Computer power is measured in other
ways as well, including the amount of software available, the
compatibility of the operating system, and the type of mass storage.
The QL has a few factors working against it:
1. The two built-in microdrives are
not disk drives, but small endless-loop tape cartridges. Although these
microdrives are reportedly as fast as some disk drives, they're not as
fast as IBM. floppy drives (or, of course, the PC-XT's built-in hard
disk). Also, the microdrives can store only 100K per cartridge, versus
360K for an IBM floppy and ten megabytes for the hard disk.
2. The QL uses its own operating
system (QDOS), not found on other computers. Therefore, it isn't
compatible with any existing software. The PC-XT is compatible with
thousands of PC and MS-DOS programs.
3. For now, Sinclair plans to market
the QL in the U.S. by mail order only. Unless you know somebody who
already owns a QL, you won't be able to examine a machine without
buying it. There also won't be any local dealers to provide personal
assistance for new owners.
Although Sinclair
Research is one of the top personal computer companies in Britain and
Europe, it is known in the U.S. mainly for small low-end home computers
which have practically vanished from the marketplace. Sinclair has
never marketed a business-oriented or high-end personal computer in the
U.S.
The low price,
ironically, may discourage some people from considering the QL as a
business computer, no matter how much processing power it offers. A
British computer magazine journalist recently told us that most QLs are
being bought in Britain for home use, not business use.
Even if the
innovative Sinclair QL is not a hit in the U.S. marketplace for these
or other reasons, computers based on similar technology will soon be
available at similar prices. In the first half of 1985, Atari plans to
introduce both a 68000-based 16/32bit computer and a full 32-bit
machine-both retailing for under $1,000 (see "The New Atari: Q & A
With Sigmund Hartmann," COMPUTE!, February 1985). Commodore also hopes
to release a 68000based computer based on the prototype Amiga Lorraine
for $1,000 or less (see the CES report in the August 1984 COMPUTE!).
Still, you may not
need this much processing power, or you may prefer a computer which
already has a large software library. In late 1984 Atari slashed the
price of the 800XL you are considering to under $120 (with similar
reductions for peripherals), and also was hoping to unveil a 128K RAM
version of the 800XL at the Winter CES in January 1985. Commodore, too,
had plans for a 128K RAM version of its popular Commodore 64. As
always, there are numerous factors to consider when buying a computer,
and the final decision is rarely an easy one.